ADOPTED MINUTES

Mental Health Board

Tuesday, February 10, 2010

City Hall, Room 278

San Francisco, CA

 

BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: James Shaye Keys, Secretary; Susan McIntyre, ; Mary Ann Jones, PhD; M. Lara Siazon Arguelles; Tom Purvis; Errol Wishom; Iviana Williams; Lisa Williams and Virginia Wright.

BOARD MEMBERS ON LEAVE: None

BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: James L. McGhee, Chair, Officer Kelly Dunn; Njoroge Tho-Biaz, M.A.

OTHERS PRESENT: Helynna Brooke (MHB Executive Director); Loy M. Proffitt (MHB Administrator); Kavoos Bassiri, RAMS; Nan Dame, Behavioral Health Information Systems Manager; Frank Isidro, Information System Consumer Advocate; Maria Iyog-O’Malley, Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Program Coordinator; Fancher Larson, Antonio Morgan, Mental Health Association (MHA-SF); Michelle Schutz, MHA-SF; Eric P. Scott, MHA-SF; and five other members of the public.

CALL TO ORDER

The meeting was called to order at 6:39 PM by Mr. Keys.

ROLL CALL

Ms. Brooke called the roll.

AGENDA CHANGES

Mr. Keys announced that Dr. Cabaj was running late, so the meeting would start with the MHSA Public Hearing, Item 2.0.

ITEM 1.0 DIRECTORS REPORT

1.1 Discussion regarding Community Behavioral Health Services Department Report, a report on the activities and operations of Community Behavioral Health Services, including budget, planning, policy, and programs and services.

Mr. Keys: “Dr. Robert Cabaj, Director of Community Behavioral Health Services (CBHS) will give the Director’s report.”

Dr. Cabaj reviewed the monthly director’s report as attached.

Ms. McIntyre: “Does San Francisco have a public response in place that could address mental health issues should there be a disaster like the recent January 2010 earthquake in Haiti?”

Mr. Cabaj: “I have been in charge of disaster planning and services in San Francisco.  We did have simulations with the fire and police departments”

Ms. Wright: “Is the University of California of San Francisco (UCSF) Citywide & Community Focus Center open to the public?”

Dr. Cabaj: “Yes.”

Dr. Jones: “I am concerned about the MHSA voter initiative which California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger would like to raid again.”

Dr. Cabaj: “The MHSA voter initiative touches people at many levels, and I am strongly against the governor’s action.”

Mr. Purvis: “The National Alliance on Mental Illness of San Francisco (NAMI-SF) is very much opposing the Governor’s action as well.  We have used facebook and twitter to disseminate information and bring about public awareness.”

Over View of Community Behavioral Health Services

Dr. Cabaj: “Years ago we were blessed by San Francisco leaders who envisioned the inclusion of treatments for substance abuse with mental health services.  They had the foresight to recognize the inter-link between substance abuse and mental health care.

San Francisco County has a commitment to treating people who are indigent, and it is now written into the Administrative Code. But we are facing $522M in deficits so we will have to make cuts, but we are hoping for new revenue from stimulus dollars and a hospital tax which may forestall cuts. CBHS uses a lot of general fund for indigent Care, unlike other counties. For example, the Alameda County does not provide mental health services to indigents.  Only Medicare people can be qualified for treatments.  But San Francisco will not deny mental health services to people on Medicare or the indigent because SF does not distinguish such differences. Healthy San Francisco also increases access to primary care for many.

The San Francisco model of care is an inverted pyramid with the most expensive services at the bottom and prevention at the top. Thirty years ago we had 300 beds at Napa State Hospital and we now have only 41 beds. People were discharged however, before community services were available. There was also an explosion of access to street drugs at that time. Napa costs $175,000 per year per person for long term care.

In-patient adult psychiatry did not generate revenue for the City.  We have lost psychiatric beds at St. Mary Hospital, St. Luke Hospital and San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) when these institutions went through down sizing.  We tried to work with University of California of San Francisco hospital (UCSF) but UCSF does not take people with Medicare.  We still have a few beds with SF General and at St. Francis, we have p to 36 beds. UCSF cannot accept Medicare. They have 42 beds. At St. Mary’s Hospital, we still have a small adolescent psychiatric unit. We have some people at California Pacific Hospital but it is expensive because we don’t have a contract with them because they will not abide by the City’s Sunshine Laws.

The Dore Urgent Care Center is an alternative to the Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES).  Dore is able to receive people who are 5150’d but cannot hold people involuntarily. We have roughly fifty-two beds at Acute Diversion Units where patients can get about two weeks of care.

We replaced the day treatment for adults with the wellness recovery and socialization program because this program is more cost efficient.”

Dr. Jones: “The clubhouse model works well with people with schizophrenia while the drop-in model is good for those with mood disorders.”

Dr. Cabaj: “We are looking for new sites to have more drop-in capability.”

Ms. McIntyre: “Can you elaborate about the day treatment program for adults?”

Dr. Cabaj: “We found day treatment programs to not work well for people, but case management seems to work better.  There are over 500 practitioners participating in a private provider network (PPN).  Many people do not see the importance of prevention, but we believe prevention is very important!  The MHSA has helped with prevention funding, the Early Psychosis Project is an example.  We are not cutting mental health services.  It is more of squeezing and shifting services around.  Primary care can take on mental health care.

Dr. Jones: “How does the Mental Health Plan work with respect to being accepted at private hospitals?”

Dr. Cabaj: “The Mental Health Plan was originally designed for MediCal clients.  That is why the Alameda County only takes MediCal clients and turns away indigents.  But San Francisco uses general fund to contract out mental health services to providers who can provide the best services regardless of the person’s MediCal status.

Another thing we do is the integration of mental health with primary care.  We contract out, for example, to St. Francis Hospital.  But we do not have any contractual agreements with California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC).  At SFGH, many psychiatric patients are not characterized as acute cases.  Thus, we do not get acute psychiatric money from MediCal.

Mr. Wishom: “I worked at SFGH’s in-patient units for about a year.  It seemed that there were more empty beds”

Dr. Cabaj: “The whole unit was closed down.  One unit was changed from acute to non-acute status.”

Ms. Arguelles: “When the Mental Health Rehabilitation Facility (MHRF) reduced psychiatric beds, my daughter was sent to the East Bay.  Is it not more expensive to send such patients out of San Francisco?”

Dr. Cabaj: “The placement team authorizes the levels of care based on various criteria that sometimes shift people outside of San Francisco to places like Crestwood Manors which is operated by the Crestwood Behavioral Incorporated.  It has places in San Jose, Vallejo, Novato, and Fremont.

The cost of real-estate property in San Francisco is still very high which prohibits building any new long-term care facilities.  Utilizing out-of-county services, sometimes, is the only option.  One of the reasons we are trying to reduce long-term out of county beds is because it is expensive and hard on families.  It would be good to have more access to safe housing and case management.

Ms. Wright: “How long can a patient with mental illness stay before getting kicked out of a hospital?”

Dr. Cabaj: “The average length of stay at places like St. Francis is about seven days and SFGH is about eleven days.  With modern medications, people with mental illness can be stabilized in about five days.”

1.2 Public Comment

Mr. Morgan: Mr. Antonio Morgan is from the Mental Health Association (MHA-SF).  He mentioned that the Mobile Crisis Treatment Team saved his life.  He said when people with mental illness are put in jail the City and County San Francisco usually ends up spending more money anyway.  He also talked about indigents in distress often having difficulty getting access to mental health services.

Dr. Cabaj: “Community Behavior Health Services includes public policies to advocate for our system of care.  We try to give people risk assessment within twenty-four hours.  Our Treatment Access Program (TAP) at 1380 Howard is a one-stop program to reduce the run around.  Community Behavior Health Services (CBHS) recognizes that mental illnesses affect all of us directly and indirectly.

Not only do people with mental illness often get stigmatized and discriminated against, not only do the loved ones feel helpless to stand by and watch their family or friends suffer an active psychosis but also often untreated psychosis drives mental ill people to behave in such a way that these people often become homeless or get incarcerated.  I am very much committed to improving mental health care for all San Franciscans.”


Monthly Director’s Report

February 10, 2010

 

1.      Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Update

 

INNOVATION COMPONENT THREE YEAR PROGRAM AND EXPENDITURE PLAN

The Innovation Component Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan is now posted on the San Francisco MHSA website for a period of 30 days, from February 9, 2010 to March 10, 2010.  The link is:  http://www.sfdph.org/dph/comupg/oservices/mentalHlth/MHSA/mnu30-DayNotice.asp.  Please e-mail your comments to:  prop63@sfdph.org or send to:  Community Behavioral Health Services, Mental Health Services Act, 1380 Howard Street, 2nd  Floor, San Francisco, CA  94103;  Attention: Marlo Simmons.

 

FY10-11 ANNUAL PLAN UPDATE

MHSA regulation requires counties to submit an annual plan update every fiscal year for each component that has an approved Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan.  For San Francisco County, the Three Year Plans for Community Services and Support, Workforce Education and Training, and Prevention and Early Intervention have already been approved.  The Annual Plan Update is the mechanism by which counties are able to access their funding allocations for the coming fiscal year and request approval for unspent prior year allocations.  The FY10-11 Annual Plan Update is now posted on the MHSA website for a period of 30 days, from February 9, 2010 to March 10, 2010.  The link is:  http://www.sfdph.org/dph/comupg/oservices/mentalHlth/MHSA/mnu30-DayNotice.asp.  Please e-mail your comments to:  prop63@sfdph.org or send to:  Community Behavioral Health Services, Mental Health Services Act, 1380 Howard Street, 2nd  Floor, San Francisco, CA  94103;  Attention:  Maria Iyog-O’Malley

 

MHSA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETINGS

The Mental Health Services Act Advisory Committee meets bi-monthly from 3-5 pm, alternating between advisory meetings and community forums.  The next scheduled meetings are as follows:

Wednesday, February 17, 2010                                         Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Community Forum                                                  Advisory Meeting

UCSF Citywide & Community Focus Center                      1380 Howard Street

982 Mission Street, San Francisco, CA 94103                 San Francisco, CA  94103

 

Upcoming Training

Thursday, February 11, 2010- Friday, February 12, 2010

Into the Eye of the Storm: Essentials of Disaster Mental Health

Presenter: Diane Myers, R.N., M.S.N., C.T.S.

San Francisco Federal Building

90th Seventh Street, 8:30am - 4:30pm

Mental health professionals are increasingly called upon to respond to large-scale, community-wide disasters. This workshop will provide participants with essential knowledge and skills for intervening effectively with mental health needs in the complex and intense aftermath of disaster. Topics will include types of disaster, trauma caused by disaster, risk groups, and phases of disaster recovery. Clinicians will learn how disaster mental health interventions differ from psychotherapy, and will learn effective mental health interventions to be used in a variety of disaster settings and time phases. Organizational aspects of disaster response will be discussed, with an emphasis on how mental health professionals can become part of an organized and integrated community response effort. Self-care and prevention of secondary traumatization for disaster mental health professionals will be emphasized.

 

Thursday, February 18, 2010-Friday, February 19, 2010

CISM: Group Crisis Intervention A Curriculum of the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation (ICISF)

Presenter: Diane Myers, R.N., M.S.N., C.T.S.

San Francisco Federal Building

90th Seventh Street, 8:30am - 4:30pm

Fire, floods, earthquakes, transportation accidents, workplace and community violence, terrorism—mental health professionals are increasingly called upon to respond to disasters and their traumatic impacts.  This workshop will provide participants with the knowledge and skills essential to providing Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) services in the complex and intense aftermath of trauma and disaster.  CISM is a form of early intervention called psychological first aid. It is not psychotherapy. Through lecture and readings, participants will learn the history of traumatic stress and psychological first aid interventions in response to traumatic events; examples of events that can cause traumatic stress reactions; the human stress response; and basic concepts of traumatic stress.  They will learn an overview of CISM interventions, research on the effectiveness of psychological first aid, and best practices in early intervention with trauma. Through viewing videotapes, observing demonstrations of interventions, participating in group discussion, and practicing skills in small groups, participants will gain experience in using the group intervention of demobilization, crisis management briefing, Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD), and defusing.

For more information regarding these trainings, please contact Norman Aleman, CBHS

Training Coordinator at 415-255-3553 or email norman.aleman@sfdph.org

_____________________________________________________________________________

Past issues of the CBHS Monthly Director’s Report are available at: http://www.sfdph.org/dph/comupg/oservices/mentalHlth/CBHS/CBHSdirRpts.asp  

To receive this Monthly Report via e-mail, please e-mail richelle-lynn.mojica@sfdph.org

Item 2.0 MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE ACT UPDATES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS

2.1 Public Hearing: MHSA Information Technology Component and Technological Needs Project Proposals.

(The presentation is attached)

Mr. Keys: “As part of the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), the Mental Health Board is required to hold public hearings of all new plans or updates.  Community Behavioral Health Services has just completed the Information Technology Component and Technological Needs Project Proposals.  The team will present the proposal then respond to MHB member questions and comments, and then the public will have an opportunity to make comments.”

Ms. Iyog-O’Malley: “Good evening.  I am the MHSA Program Coordinator.  This Board has heard all five components of MHSA: Community Support and Services (CSS) in 2005, Workforce Education and Development (WET) in 2008, Prevention and Early Intervention in 2008, Capital Facilities in 2009, now Information Technology (IT) in 2010.  San Francisco City and County has ten years to spend $8.6M in Capital Facility and IT.  Mr. Isidro who is the Information System Consumer Advocate will present the IT component.”

Mr. Isidro: “I would like to mention that Ms. Nan Dame and I are co-authors of the project.  Ms. Dame who is the Behavioral Health Information Systems Manager will elaborate the electronic records and patient records section.

Please follow along with me on the power point presentation.  MHSA IT goals are to increase client and family member empowerment and to modernize and transform mental health services.

The planning process started in September 2008 and ended about six month latter.  All meetings were open to the public, and there was an average of 23 members of the public attending.  Our first meeting started in January 2009 with 26 voting members on the MHSA-IT Planning Committee.  Of the 26 total, there were 12 consumers, 14 community based providers including 2 alternates.  The Mental Health Board of San Francisco staff member, Loy Proffitt was on the MHSA-IT Planning Committee.

To increase public participation and accessibility, meetings were held at various community clinics and sites and electronic communications were used to keep everyone abreast of any changes.  The committee voted to establish a three-year pilot project. Here are some highlights:

         3 years Consumer Connect

         A total of 80 high-speed Internet kiosks at forty provider sites

         Interfaces to hospitals, laboratory and jails

         10 voice recognition software

         5 language translators

         3 years licensing for the San Francisco Network of Care

         Help desk coverage and

         Document imaging

Now, Ms. Nan Dame will talk about the Consumer Connect.”

Ms. Dame: “Consumer Connect is the software interface that provides electronic health record (EHR) and personal health records (PHR) that are maintained in a database system.  The database is a depository of demographics, progress notes, problems, medications, medical history, immunizations, laboratory data and radiology reports.  Clients have confidential access to their PHR database and complete control over their personal information.

Dr. Jones: “It is very exciting and revolutionary for San Francisco to have an IT component in mental health care that will be integrated with primary care.  This is a big contrast to the Kaiser Permanente system which only has IT for primary care.”

Ms. Dame: “The integration of primary care and mental health care records will take some time to complete.  We are still working on it. We do plan to have a link between medications, allergies, etc. This replaces the InSyst program”

Dr. Jones: “Will it be more recovery based in discussion? Do you see this as treatment plan focused?”

Ms. Dame: “That question can be answered by Dr. Robert Cabaj.”

Dr. Cabaj: “We are working with the State to encourage more of a strength based approach.  We hope the staff can do both.”

Ms. McIntyre: “Is there any security against identity theft if a laptop got stolen?”

Ms. Dame: “Information resides on the server only.  So public access to the database at the library would not be compromised.”

Mr. Purvis: “What technology do consumers have?”

Ms. Dame: “The consumer employment would provide the training by peer consumers to clients.”

Ms. Arguelles: “What happens if a consumer moves to a different county?”

Ms. Dame: “The consumer still has access anywhere just like they would with their web-access email.”

Ms. Arguelles: “Can an out-of-county provider have access to this record?”

Ms. Dame: “As long as the consumer gives the provider permission to do so.”

2.2 Public comment

Mr. Scott: Mr. Eric P. Scott mentioned that he has several serious concerns with the EHR and PHR systems.  He was concerned that data being stored with one vendor might expose us to the risk of data loss if the provider were to go out of business, or the vendor could raise costs and hold the system hostage.  He suggested that a two-factor authentication should be considered.  He also thought that the Consumer Connect should be available on open-source platforms such as Linux, Microsoft Windows and Macintosh. He was also concerned about difficulties people with poor literacy or minimal English proficiency, the difficulty of remembering passwords and potentially being locked out after three attempts. He was further concerned about the tendency people have to pick the same password for everything.

Mr. Bassiri: Mr. Kavoos G. Basssiri wanted to know if there are policies about response time and speeed to people’s requests and comments via electronic communications, phone calls or letters.  He suggested that it would be good to have specific provider policy regarding response time.

Mr. Isidro: “I would like to respond to Mr. Eric Scott’s comments.  We have security features that would make it difficult for consumer security to be compromised.”

Ms Larson: She mentioned that she was on the MHSA-IT Planning Committee.  She was glad to have this public meeting.

ITEM 3.0 ACTION ITEMS

3.1. Public comment

No public comments.

3.2. Resolutions

3.2 a  PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Be it resolved that the minutes of the Mental Health Board meeting of January 13, 2010 be approved as submitted.

Resolution unanimously approved.

ITEM 4.0 ELECTION OF OFFICERS

For discussion and action

4.1 Public Comment.

4.2 Report from Nominating Committee

Ms. Williams: “The Nominating Committee stated the nominees at the January 13, 2010 meeting as: Mary Ann Jones, PhD, or James Shaye Keys, Chair; Lara Arguelles or Susan McIntyre as Vice Chair; Mary Ann Jones, PhD as Secretary. Additional nominations can be made from the floor prior to voting.  We will vote on each position one by one. Sunshine laws require that we vote publicly. We will begin with the two nominees for Chair, Dr. Mary Ann Jones and James Shaye Keys.  Are there any additional nominations from the floor?  You may also nominate yourself.”

There were no nominations from the floor.

“I would like each of you to say a few words about why you would like to be elected Chair of the Mental Health Board and what you would bring to the board.”

Dr. Jones: “I am a San Francisco native and grew up in the Western Addition and I came to the Board both as a consumer and a professional.”

Mr. Keys: “Thank you for the nomination.  I’ve been on the board since 2005.  During my time of four-and-half years, we have done much advocacy: bringing more services to the Southeast Sector.”

Ms. Williams: “Thank you for your statements.  Ms. Brooke will call the roll for each candidate. You need to say yes or no to indicate your vote for the candidate.”

Ms. Brooke: Congratulations Mr. Keys for the Chair position.

Ms. Williams: “Now, we will vote for Vice Chair. Lara Arguelles and Susan McIntyre have been nominated. Are there additional nominations from the floor? I would like each of you to say a few words about why you would like to be elected Vice Chair.  Ms. Brooke will call the roll for each candidate. You need to say yes or no to indicate your vote for the candidate.”

Ms. Brooke: “Congratulations Ms. McIntyre, you are now the Vice Chair.”

Ms. Williams: “Now, we will vote for Secretary. Dr. Mary Ann Jones has been nominated. Are there additional nominations from the floor?

Mr. Wishom: “I would like to nominate myself.”

Mr. Keys: “I would like to nominate Ms. Arguelles.”

Ms. Williams: “Ms. Brooke will call the roll for each candidate. You need to say yes or no to indicate your vote for the candidate.”

Ms. Brooke: “Congratulations Dr. Jones, you are now the Secretary.”

ITEM 5.0 REPORTS

5.1 Report from the Executive Director of the Mental Health Board.

Ms. Brooke: ”I would like to call your attention to the flyers in your packet about events happening this month.. Loy met with CBHS staff and Sarah Accomazzo to put together this years Program Review list and he can come along with any board member who would like his assistance during the program review. He will sit in on the provider interviews but not the client interviews.  I want to call your attention to a survey that Sarah Accomazzo did which showed that the two key issues that concern women and girls are body image and trauma.. Finally, I want to remind everyone about the Public Hearing at City Hall on February 25, 2010 focusing on the impact of budget cuts.”

5.2 Report of the Chair of the Board and the Executive Committee:

No report.

5.3 Report of the Chair of the Nominating Committee: Lisa Williams

Election completed.

5.4 Report by members of the Board on their activities on behalf of the Board.

Mr. Keys: “At the last executive meeting we came up with the name called City in Peril to emphasize the impact of mental health budget cuts.  This is a theme at the February 25, 2010 special meeting that Ms. Brooke just talked about.”

Mr. Purvis: “This public hearing is critical to NAMI.”

5.5 New business - Suggestions for future agenda items to be referred to the Executive Committee.

No suggestions made.

5.6 Public comment

ITEM 6.0 PUBLIC COMMENT

Mr. Bassiri: “I want to mention that Richmond Area Multi-Services Inc. (RAMS) was awarded two services contracts: the Summer Bridge program which is an eight week program for high school students to inspire them to go into healthcare which will start in June 2010 and a Peer Specialist Mental Health Certificate program which is a collaboration with San Francisco State University to offer certificates which starts in September 2010, fall semester.  RAMS is soliciting inputs from stakeholders.”

Mr. Keys: “Do these programs come from the MHSA Workforce Education and Development (WET) money?

Mr. Bassiri: ”Yes.”

Adjournment

Meeting adjourned at 8:59 PM.

PRESENTATION: Information Technology Component of MHSA

San Francisco Department of Public Health Community Behavioral Health Services

Mental Health Services Act Proposal:

Information Technology Component {MHSA-IT}

MHSA IT Goals

         Increase Client and Family Member Empowerment

        by providing the tools for secure client and family access to health information that is culturally and linguistically competent within a wide variety of Public and private settings

         Modernize and Transform Mental Health Services

        by providing transformation of clinical and administrative information systems to ensure quality (and continuity) of care, operational efficiency and cost effectiveness

MHSA-IT Public Planning Process

         September 2008: MHSA-IT Task Force built upon previous MHSA planning processes to initiate a series of 10 Public meetings.

         January 2009: 26 member MHSA-IT Planning Committee appointed by CBHS Directors.

        Twenty-six voting members

o        12 Consumers

o        14 Community based providers

o        2 alternates

         January through May 2009: 10 Planning meetings held

        Open to the public

o        Notices posted at community clinics and sites,

o        Rotated community sites

o        Email sent to all members and interested parties

        Average 23 participants:

o        11 consumer/family members

o        7 community providers

o        5 members of the public

MHSA-IT Public Planning Process

         The Committee held two brainstorming sessions to identify ideas and preferences for use of technology to improve mental health services.

         Ideas were prioritized and reviewed for applicability, feasibility and cost.

         The final vote resulted in selection of a 3 year pilot project to:

        Add a consumer portal to the new Behavioral Health electronic health record project

        Enhance that project by addition of electronic signatures, document imaging and additional eprescribing licenses

        Implement IT related training and employment opportunities for MH consumers

The San Francisco MHSA-IT Proposal

CONSUMER CONNECT
Modernize and Transform Mental Health Services
{Budget = $2,004,440}

         3 years Consumer Connect (EHR Portal) 2 computer kiosks with high speed internet at 40 provider sites

         eSignatures

         Interfaces to Hosp/Primary care, Laboratories, Jails

         10 voice recognition software licenses

         5 language translator/pocket PC/ 3 yr licenses

         1 Full Time Engineer

         1 Full Time Consumer Advocate

         Add 3 years licensing for the SF Network of Care

The San Francisco MHSA-IT Proposal

CONSUMER TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT
Increase Client and Family Member Empowerment
{Budget = $1,819,910}

Consumer Support Training and Employment:

         Train the Trainers - 1 Coordinator, 1 Admin. Assistant., + 8 trainees

         3 persons to provide Help Desk coverage 1 person for 8 hrs per day

Document Imaging

         Point Of Service Document Imaging: 4 persons for 3 yrs, plus supervision

         Conversion document imaging: 2 persons for 1 yr with training plus supervision

Consumer Connect

Electronic Health Record (EHR)

         An electronic record of patient health information over time, generated by one or more providers. Contains demographics, progress notes, problems, medications, medical history, immunizations, laboratory data and radiology reports.

         EHR is owned and maintained by the provider

Personal Health Record (PHR)

         A confidential tool for managing health information and recent services, such as allergies, medications, personal medical facts, and doctor or hospital visits that can be stored in one place, then shared with others, as the client wishes.

         PHR is owned and maintained by the client

What is Consumer Connect?

         A secured web interface or portal into the Avatar HER

         Provides easy access to health information for:

         Consumers

         Authorized family members

         Authorized providers

         A communication tool between consumers (and/or family members) and their care team

Features – Secure Login

         User ID is locked if maximum number of login attempts is exceeded

         If the user forgets their password, they have the ability to reset it (if they correctly answer their pre-selected security questions)


Home Page

Appointments


Medications

Medication Comments Journal


Health Record

Treatment Plan


Treatment Plan Journal Entry

Messages